* wip: identify whats needed to obviate ghostlinkd
* fix: hardlink new charter files to ftp directory
* fix: hardlink new charter files to ftp directory (continued)
* chore: bring settings comment up to date
* chore: add archive and ftp dirs to setup of various environments
* fix: test charter submits write to ftp dir
* chore: remove debug
* fix: test charter approval writes to ftp dir
* fix: link review revisions into ftp dir
* fix: link to all archive and ftp on submission post
* chore: clean comments, move action to github issue
* fix: link idindex files to all archive and ftp
* chore: deflake
* chore: remove TODO comment
* fix: use settings
* chore: rename new setting
* feat: Allow reviewer to accept a review they're previously rejected
* feat: Add a reviewer who has previously rejected a review to the list of suggested reviewers.
This largely un-does d105f8b, at the request of at least one team secretary.
* fix: Went a little overboard on the previous commit
one_assignment still has to exclude reviewers who rejected the assignment,
or they could end up being the suggested reviewer.
* fix: Actually do the assignment
* fix: If there's an existing assignment, don't create a new one
* style: Restructure conditional for clarity
* test: Add test cases for accepting or assigning a review assignment after rejecting it
* Added a new review team setting
allow_reviewer_to_reject_after_deadline that will allow rejecting
review requests, even after the deadline is past. Also modified that
the secretary, or whoever manages the reviews is always allowed to
reject the review regardless of the deadline as he/she could change
the deadline anyways.
* Fixed but in view_reviews (wrong variable name), added more test
cases to the test_reviews.py for different reject cases.
* test: More thoroughly exercise assignment rejection
* chore: Renumber migration
* test: Unrelated user cannot reject assignments
---------
Co-authored-by: Jennifer Richards <jennifer@staff.ietf.org>
* fix: test on postgres. post and check intended pks.
* fix: pass and check intended pks
* fix: pass intended pk
* fix: get an actually usable group type for test
* fix: use a review assignment pk instead of the review request pk
* fix: Use pks of sessions, not schedtimesessassignments
* fix: test for actual pk and do not rely on case-insensitive LIKE
* fix: test for actual pk
* chore: spelling correction: nomine -> nominee
* test: compare UTC dates in test_search_mail_archive()
* test: compare datetimes, not dates, in action holders test
* test: adjust test to match TZ used for IPR notification message
* test: fix timezone in date_today() calls for liaisons tests
* test: use settings.TIME_ZONE for date in nomination tests
* test: correctly use settings.TIME_ZONE instead of system time zone
* Search for escaped name in HTML output
* Need to check for `plain_name()` in sent emails
* Normalize i18n Unicode names in the same way the database does
* refactor: replace datetime.now with timezone.now
* refactor: migrate model fields to use timezone.now as default
* refactor: replace datetime.today with timezone.now
datetime.datetime.today() is equivalent to datetime.datetime.now(); both
return a naive datetime with the current local time.
* refactor: rephrase datetime.now(tz) as timezone.now().astimezone(tz)
This is effectively the same, but is less likely to encourage accidental
use of naive datetimes.
* refactor: revert datetime.today() change to old migrations
* refactor: change a missed datetime.now to timezone.now
* chore: renumber timezone_now migration
* chore: renumber migrations
Replaced review name collision resolution code with a decision to not save when it occurs. Fixes#3092.
- Legacy-Id: 18559
Note: SVN reference [18533] has been migrated to Git commit 0ff5172a89d5a7ad48cb1fd03b1c8926e26e50f9
This abstracts queue management, making it possible to implement different
policies for each team. It provides two concrete policies:
RotateAlphabeticallyReviewerQueuePolicy, which rotates an alphabetically
ordered reviewer list with consideration for skip indications, and is the
default policy; and LeastRecentlyUsedReviewerQueuePolicy, a simple
least-recently-used policy. Also see issues #2721 and #2656.
- Legacy-Id: 17121
Fix#2278 - Notify secretary when a review request is closed.
The assigned reviewer was already notified, but secretaries were always
excluded.
- Legacy-Id: 17108
Note: SVN reference [17085] has been migrated to Git commit 56003f66d8
Fix#2061 - Improve 'complete review' workflow for secretaries.
When a secretary completes a review, 'link to a review message'
is automatically selected, and the first non-reply mail is used to
fill in the review details. The secretary can still modify all details.
The order of fields for secretaries is also modified to fit this workflow.
All cases where 'link to review message' is used, by reviewers or
secretaries, now attempt to fill in the 'reviewed version' if found
in the email subject.
- Legacy-Id: 17105
Note: SVN reference [17070] has been migrated to Git commit dc9546211f
Change the default template for assigned review emails to name the assigned reviewer. Fixes#2830.
- Legacy-Id: 17073
Note: SVN reference [17062] has been migrated to Git commit 38e73b6f89
When a secretary completes a review, "link to a review message"
is automatically selected, and the first non-reply mail is used to
fill in the review details. The secretary can still modify all details.
The order of fields for secretaries is also modified to fit this workflow.
All cases where "link to review message" is used, by reviewers or
secretaries, now attempt to fill in the "reviewed version" if found
in the email subject.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 17070
