datatracker/ietf/templates/doc/conflict_review/approval_text.txt
Lars Eggert f8b48f4c43
fix: use Internet-Draft more consistently across the UI (#5104)
* s/Internet Draft/Internet-Draft/i

* s/draft/Internet-Draft/i or s/draft/I-D/i

* s/ID/I-D/

* Fix tests

* a -> an

* Undo case-change to ASCII

* Address code review comments

* Add migrations

* Add merged migration

* fix: straighten out migrations

* fix: finish straightening out migrations

---------

Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
2023-02-11 10:09:28 -06:00

32 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

{% load ietf_filters %}{% load mail_filters %}{% autoescape off %}From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: {{ to }}
Cc: {{ cc }}
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for {{conflictdoc.canonical_name}}-{{conflictdoc.rev}}
{% filter wordwrap:78 %}The IESG has completed a review of {{conflictdoc.canonical_name}}-{{conflictdoc.rev}} consistent with RFC5742.
{% if review.get_state_slug == 'appr-reqnopub-pend' %}
The IESG recommends that '{{ conflictdoc.title }}' {{ conflictdoc.file_tag|safe }} NOT be published as {{ conflictdoc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
{% else %}
The IESG has no problem with the publication of '{{ conflictdoc.title }}' {{ conflictdoc.file_tag|safe }} as {{ conflictdoc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
{% endif %}
{{ approved_review }}
The IESG would also like the {{receiver}} to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log.
The IESG review is documented at:
{{review_url}}
A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is:
{{conflictdoc_url}}
The process for such documents is described {% if conflictdoc.stream_id == 'ise' %}at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html {% else %}{% if conflictdoc.stream_id == 'irtf' %}in RFC 5743 {% endif %} {% endif %}
Thank you,
The IESG Secretary
{% endfilter %}
{% endautoescape %}