datatracker/ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt
Robert Sparks 0e2dd258c7 Made several changes to correctly use the new (RFC6410) "Internet Standard" level
in email that gets sent at various stages in the handling of documents.

Fixes bug 821
 - Legacy-Id: 4288
2012-04-17 21:00:26 +00:00

24 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

{% load mail_filters %}{% autoescape off %}From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: {{to}}
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for {{ doc.file_tag }}
{% filter wordwrap:73 %}
The IESG has completed a review of <{{ doc.name }}> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams.
{% if disapproved %}
The IESG recommends that '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} NOT be published as {{ doc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
{% else %}
The IESG has no problem with the publication of '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} as {{ doc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker ({{ doc_url }}) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log.{% endif %}
A URL of this {{ doc_type }} is:
{{ doc_url }}
The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html
Thank you,
The IESG Secretary
{% endfilter %}
{% endautoescape %}