* fix: test on postgres. post and check intended pks.
* fix: pass and check intended pks
* fix: pass intended pk
* fix: get an actually usable group type for test
* fix: use a review assignment pk instead of the review request pk
* fix: Use pks of sessions, not schedtimesessassignments
* fix: test for actual pk and do not rely on case-insensitive LIKE
* fix: test for actual pk
* chore: spelling correction: nomine -> nominee
* test: compare UTC dates in test_search_mail_archive()
* test: compare datetimes, not dates, in action holders test
* test: adjust test to match TZ used for IPR notification message
* test: fix timezone in date_today() calls for liaisons tests
* test: use settings.TIME_ZONE for date in nomination tests
* test: correctly use settings.TIME_ZONE instead of system time zone
* Search for escaped name in HTML output
* Need to check for `plain_name()` in sent emails
* Normalize i18n Unicode names in the same way the database does
* refactor: replace datetime.now with timezone.now
* refactor: migrate model fields to use timezone.now as default
* refactor: replace datetime.today with timezone.now
datetime.datetime.today() is equivalent to datetime.datetime.now(); both
return a naive datetime with the current local time.
* refactor: rephrase datetime.now(tz) as timezone.now().astimezone(tz)
This is effectively the same, but is less likely to encourage accidental
use of naive datetimes.
* refactor: revert datetime.today() change to old migrations
* refactor: change a missed datetime.now to timezone.now
* chore: renumber timezone_now migration
* chore: renumber migrations
Replaced review name collision resolution code with a decision to not save when it occurs. Fixes#3092.
- Legacy-Id: 18559
Note: SVN reference [18533] has been migrated to Git commit 0ff5172a89d5a7ad48cb1fd03b1c8926e26e50f9
This abstracts queue management, making it possible to implement different
policies for each team. It provides two concrete policies:
RotateAlphabeticallyReviewerQueuePolicy, which rotates an alphabetically
ordered reviewer list with consideration for skip indications, and is the
default policy; and LeastRecentlyUsedReviewerQueuePolicy, a simple
least-recently-used policy. Also see issues #2721 and #2656.
- Legacy-Id: 17121
Fix#2278 - Notify secretary when a review request is closed.
The assigned reviewer was already notified, but secretaries were always
excluded.
- Legacy-Id: 17108
Note: SVN reference [17085] has been migrated to Git commit 56003f66d8
Fix#2061 - Improve 'complete review' workflow for secretaries.
When a secretary completes a review, 'link to a review message'
is automatically selected, and the first non-reply mail is used to
fill in the review details. The secretary can still modify all details.
The order of fields for secretaries is also modified to fit this workflow.
All cases where 'link to review message' is used, by reviewers or
secretaries, now attempt to fill in the 'reviewed version' if found
in the email subject.
- Legacy-Id: 17105
Note: SVN reference [17070] has been migrated to Git commit dc9546211f
Change the default template for assigned review emails to name the assigned reviewer. Fixes#2830.
- Legacy-Id: 17073
Note: SVN reference [17062] has been migrated to Git commit 38e73b6f89
When a secretary completes a review, "link to a review message"
is automatically selected, and the first non-reply mail is used to
fill in the review details. The secretary can still modify all details.
The order of fields for secretaries is also modified to fit this workflow.
All cases where "link to review message" is used, by reviewers or
secretaries, now attempt to fill in the "reviewed version" if found
in the email subject.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 17070
Look at the tree of replaces-relationships when determining if some reviewer has reviewed this (or perhaps an ancestor) of this document. Fixes#2821.
- Legacy-Id: 16992
Note: SVN reference [16981] has been migrated to Git commit f740adcfc1
Fix#2050 - Allow adding review wishes from document and search pages.
On the main page of a document and in document search results, a new
button allows review team members to add a review wish for that document.
For reviewers that are only on one team, this essentially works
identical to tracking a document. Reviewers that are on multiple teams
are lead through an intermediate step to select a review team, and then
returned to their search or document page.
- Legacy-Id: 16985
Note: SVN reference [16939] has been migrated to Git commit 6e55f26dbd
On the main page of a document and in document search results, a new
button allows review team members to add a review wish for that document.
For reviewers that are only on one team, this essentially works
identical to tracking a document. Reviewers that are on multiple teams
are lead through an intermediate step to select a review team, and then
returned to their search or document page.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16939
Fix#2217 - Allow submission of unsolicited reviews by secretaries.
- For team secretaries, a button 'Submit unsolicited review' will now
appear next to 'Request review' on the document's main page.
- If the secretary is a secretary for multiple teams, they are taken
through an intermediate page to select for which team they are
submitting their review.
- The form is similar (and using the same code) as the usual review
completion, with a few extra fields for the review type and reviewer,
which would usually already be known.
- When submitting the review, a ReviewRequest and ReviewAssignment are
automatically created. The assignment is then immediately closed in
the usual way.
- Other workflows are unchanged.
The issues with the review form in #2061 are slightly worse for the
unsolicited review scenario, but that will be improved when #2061 is
fixed.
- Legacy-Id: 16932
Note: SVN reference [16924] has been migrated to Git commit 871a4b653b
Fix#2087 - Show doc authors and WG chairs in unassigned reviews views.
- Legacy-Id: 16931
Note: SVN reference [16923] has been migrated to Git commit 93797b3fc1
Fix#2123 - Use a DBTemplate when a review assignment is mailed.
The message sent to a reviewer when a new review is assigned to them,
is now taken from a DBTemplate, allowing it to be customised
per team. This includes a migration to create a default template,
which looks the same as before.
- Legacy-Id: 16928
Note: SVN reference [16921] has been migrated to Git commit 9df5839874
