* feat: Allow reviewer to accept a review they're previously rejected
* feat: Add a reviewer who has previously rejected a review to the list of suggested reviewers.
This largely un-does d105f8b, at the request of at least one team secretary.
* fix: Went a little overboard on the previous commit
one_assignment still has to exclude reviewers who rejected the assignment,
or they could end up being the suggested reviewer.
* fix: Actually do the assignment
* fix: If there's an existing assignment, don't create a new one
* style: Restructure conditional for clarity
* test: Add test cases for accepting or assigning a review assignment after rejecting it
* Added check that if there is already review request for the document
in question, ignore the automatic suggestion for that document.
Fixes#3211.
* fix: dont block on open requests for a previous version. Add tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Giard <github@ngpixel.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
* Specific email subject + requester/secretary in cc
* Send the deadline in the subject
* Use unicode rather than ASCII for reviewer's name
* More log info in the test
* Fix the closing parenthesis
* Fix the email test when review is assigned
* chore: address review comment
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
* refactor: replace datetime.now with timezone.now
* refactor: migrate model fields to use timezone.now as default
* refactor: replace datetime.today with timezone.now
datetime.datetime.today() is equivalent to datetime.datetime.now(); both
return a naive datetime with the current local time.
* refactor: rephrase datetime.now(tz) as timezone.now().astimezone(tz)
This is effectively the same, but is less likely to encourage accidental
use of naive datetimes.
* refactor: revert datetime.today() change to old migrations
* refactor: change a missed datetime.now to timezone.now
* chore: renumber timezone_now migration
* chore: renumber migrations
* ci: Also check generated HTML with the "vnu" validator
Because HTML Tidy apparently misses a bunch of errors.
* thead -> tbody
* More fixes
* More fixes
* Start checker in test runner
Send secretary's review reminders to secretary instead of assignee.
Send unconfirmed assignment reminders based on assignment age and CC secretaries.
Correctly separate open review reminders by review team.
Fixes#3482. Fixes#3324. Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 19848
Reviewers can set this flag in their reviewer settings, which triggers
a mail to be sent to the secretary. They are then kept on top of the
recommended assignment order. This flag is automatically reset when any
assignment is made to the reviewer.
- Legacy-Id: 17048
one to set how many days to include in the reviewers list, and
another one to limit the number of completed items in the list for
each person. This version replaces the one I did earlier, and includes
much more test cases to test different limits on the reviewers page.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 17034
Fix#2119 - Allow specifying review type for suggested reviews in LC and telechat
If a review is suggested on the 'manage unassigned reviews' page, and
the document is in both last call and telechat, the assign form now asks
for the type of review that should be assigned.
This commit also fixes two bugs in this process:
- Comparisons in some cases between strings and integers
(group/views.py:1485/1487)
- Rejections when assigning suggested reviews, as they could be
considered a newly opened request due to not having a pk
(group/views.py:1508)
- Legacy-Id: 16951
Note: SVN reference [16933] has been migrated to Git commit ee4bc0cb07
Flipped a sense to put the grace period on the right side of 'today' when sending review overdue reminders to team secretaries. Fixes#2816.
- Legacy-Id: 16940
Note: SVN reference [16926] has been migrated to Git commit 7560e116bf
If a review is suggested on the "manage unassigned reviews" page, and
the document is in both last call and telechat, the assign form now asks
for the type of review that should be assigned.
This commit also fixes two bugs in this process:
- Comparisons in some cases between strings and integers
(group/views.py:1485/1487)
- Rejections when assigning suggested reviews, as they could be
considered a newly opened request due to not having a pk
(group/views.py:1508)
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16933
Fix#2087 - Show doc authors and WG chairs in unassigned reviews views.
- Legacy-Id: 16931
Note: SVN reference [16923] has been migrated to Git commit 93797b3fc1
Fix#2118 - Always list all last call drafts in assignment summary.
If a draft is scheduled for a telechat, but also assigned for LC review,
it will now be listed both in the telechat section and under 'last calls'.
- Legacy-Id: 16913
Note: SVN reference [16904] has been migrated to Git commit 82c63b49f3
Ref #2526 - Fix test failure in [16895]
This also makes a small text clarification, which was also the initial
reason for the test failure.
- Legacy-Id: 16912
Note: SVN reference [16895] has been migrated to Git commit ef1e8006f0
Note: SVN reference [16902] has been migrated to Git commit 78a1464e77
Fix#2526 - List previous reviews in assignments email.
This includes a migration to update the database templates. Note that
not all templates currently included them (secdir at least), and
previous reviews are only listed in templates that included */** before.
As before, previous reviews are only included if they are done by the
same reviewer(s) as the current assignment.
This also fixes a bug in database template 182
(/group/defaults/email/open_assignments.txt) which referred to
r.review_request..doc.rev and r.review_request..requested_rev
in the template, and updates the test to use the current version of
template 182.
- Legacy-Id: 16911
Note: SVN reference [16895] has been migrated to Git commit ef1e8006f0
Fix#2198 - Set default start date for UnavailabilityPeriod to today.
- Legacy-Id: 16910
Note: SVN reference [16891] has been migrated to Git commit a7a2ee4a39
If a draft is scheduled for a telechat, but also assigned for LC review,
it will now be listed both in the telechat section and under "last calls".
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16904
This also makes a small text clarification, which was also the initial
reason for the test failure.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16902
Note: SVN reference [16895] has been migrated to Git commit ef1e8006f0
This includes a migration to update the database templates. Note that
not all templates currently included them (secdir at least), and
previous reviews are only listed in templates that included */** before.
As before, previous reviews are only included if they are done by the
same reviewer(s) as the current assignment.
This also fixes a bug in database template 182
(/group/defaults/email/open_assignments.txt) which referred to
r.review_request..doc.rev and r.review_request..requested_rev
in the template, and updates the test to use the current version of
template 182.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16895
Link to the about pages for groups even if they don't have a charter (some have other forms of descriptive text, and all have more information on the group pages than they did a few years ago). Fixes#2744.
- Legacy-Id: 16848
Note: SVN reference [16815] has been migrated to Git commit 26e3e62c567d8146a27a976f1da0710eeda46ba2
Fix#2475 - Send opt-in reminders for unconfirmed review assignments.
If enabled for a team, reminders will be sent every X days to reviewers
for review assignments they have not accepted or rejected.
- Legacy-Id: 16846
Note: SVN reference [16792] has been migrated to Git commit 486b6daa29
Refs #2277 - Send daily reminders of overdue reviews to secretaries
- Legacy-Id: 16839
Note: SVN reference [16765] has been migrated to Git commit cc64992204
