This abstracts queue management, making it possible to implement different
policies for each team. It provides two concrete policies:
RotateAlphabeticallyReviewerQueuePolicy, which rotates an alphabetically
ordered reviewer list with consideration for skip indications, and is the
default policy; and LeastRecentlyUsedReviewerQueuePolicy, a simple
least-recently-used policy. Also see issues #2721 and #2656.
- Legacy-Id: 17121
Fix#2278 - Notify secretary when a review request is closed.
The assigned reviewer was already notified, but secretaries were always
excluded.
- Legacy-Id: 17108
Note: SVN reference [17085] has been migrated to Git commit 56003f66d8
Fix#2074, fix#2358 - Add history for assignments, requests and unavailability.
- Legacy-Id: 17104
Note: SVN reference [17069] has been migrated to Git commit 65d84155b6
Change the default template for assigned review emails to name the assigned reviewer. Fixes#2830.
- Legacy-Id: 17073
Note: SVN reference [17062] has been migrated to Git commit 38e73b6f89
Reviewers can set this flag in their reviewer settings, which triggers
a mail to be sent to the secretary. They are then kept on top of the
recommended assignment order. This flag is automatically reset when any
assignment is made to the reviewer.
- Legacy-Id: 17048
one to set how many days to include in the reviewers list, and
another one to limit the number of completed items in the list for
each person. This version replaces the one I did earlier, and includes
much more test cases to test different limits on the reviewers page.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 17034
Fix#2119 - Allow specifying review type for suggested reviews in LC and telechat
If a review is suggested on the 'manage unassigned reviews' page, and
the document is in both last call and telechat, the assign form now asks
for the type of review that should be assigned.
This commit also fixes two bugs in this process:
- Comparisons in some cases between strings and integers
(group/views.py:1485/1487)
- Rejections when assigning suggested reviews, as they could be
considered a newly opened request due to not having a pk
(group/views.py:1508)
- Legacy-Id: 16951
Note: SVN reference [16933] has been migrated to Git commit ee4bc0cb07
Flipped a sense to put the grace period on the right side of 'today' when sending review overdue reminders to team secretaries. Fixes#2816.
- Legacy-Id: 16940
Note: SVN reference [16926] has been migrated to Git commit 7560e116bf
If a review is suggested on the "manage unassigned reviews" page, and
the document is in both last call and telechat, the assign form now asks
for the type of review that should be assigned.
This commit also fixes two bugs in this process:
- Comparisons in some cases between strings and integers
(group/views.py:1485/1487)
- Rejections when assigning suggested reviews, as they could be
considered a newly opened request due to not having a pk
(group/views.py:1508)
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16933
Fix#2217 - Allow submission of unsolicited reviews by secretaries.
- For team secretaries, a button 'Submit unsolicited review' will now
appear next to 'Request review' on the document's main page.
- If the secretary is a secretary for multiple teams, they are taken
through an intermediate page to select for which team they are
submitting their review.
- The form is similar (and using the same code) as the usual review
completion, with a few extra fields for the review type and reviewer,
which would usually already be known.
- When submitting the review, a ReviewRequest and ReviewAssignment are
automatically created. The assignment is then immediately closed in
the usual way.
- Other workflows are unchanged.
The issues with the review form in #2061 are slightly worse for the
unsolicited review scenario, but that will be improved when #2061 is
fixed.
- Legacy-Id: 16932
Note: SVN reference [16924] has been migrated to Git commit 871a4b653b
Fix#2123 - Use a DBTemplate when a review assignment is mailed.
The message sent to a reviewer when a new review is assigned to them,
is now taken from a DBTemplate, allowing it to be customised
per team. This includes a migration to create a default template,
which looks the same as before.
- Legacy-Id: 16928
Note: SVN reference [16921] has been migrated to Git commit 9df5839874
- For team secretaries, a button "Submit unsolicited review" will now
appear next to "Request review" on the document's main page.
- If the secretary is a secretary for multiple teams, they are taken
through an intermediate page to select for which team they are
submitting their review.
- The form is similar (and using the same code) as the usual review
completion, with a few extra fields for the review type and reviewer,
which would usually already be known.
- When submitting the review, a ReviewRequest and ReviewAssignment are
automatically created. The assignment is then immediately closed in
the usual way.
- Other workflows are unchanged.
The issues with the review form in #2061 are slightly worse for the
unsolicited review scenario, but that will be improved when #2061 is
fixed.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16924
The message sent to a reviewer when a new review is assigned to them,
is now taken from a DBTemplate, allowing it to be customised
per team. This includes a migration to create a default template,
which looks the same as before.
Commit ready for merge.
- Legacy-Id: 16921
Fix#2198 - Set default start date for UnavailabilityPeriod to today.
- Legacy-Id: 16910
Note: SVN reference [16891] has been migrated to Git commit a7a2ee4a39
