fix: Formatting blockquotes in datatrackers rendered markdown (#7500)

* Formatting blockquotes in datatrackers rendered markdown

* Blockquote default formatting, with overrides for legacy blockquote

* Removing unnecessary 'richtext' CSS class

---------

Co-authored-by: Matthew Holloway <Matthew Holloway>
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Holloway 2024-06-07 08:42:23 +12:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3e09c14a81
commit c1f1e1b830
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
3 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ have been written, has been sent by email and thus don't exist as a collection
in one place.</p>
<p>With my recent investigations of code analysis tools, I thought it might be
a good idea to start collecting these in one place for the project.</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote style="border-left: 0">
<cite>Henrik &lt;henrik&#64;levkowetz.com&gt;, 23 Mar 2014</cite></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="section" id="code-analysis-tools">
@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ the possibility of triggering unwanted side effects of doing an analysis run.</p
do the right thing, but once it was made to run on the datatracker code, and
ignore the django code, it didn't report anything that PyFlakes hadn't already
caught.</p>
<blockquote>
<cite>Henrik &lt;henrik&#64;levkowetz.com&gt;, 23 Mar 2014</cite></blockquote>
<blockquote style="border-left: 0">
<cite>Henrik &lt;henrik&#64;levkowetz.com&gt;, 23 Mar 2014</cite>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
<b>Does anyone have an objection to the creation of this working group being sent for EXTERNAL REVIEW?</b><br><br>
<input type="radio" name="wg_action_status" value="1"> External Review APPROVED; "The Secretariat will send a Working Group Review announcement with a copy to new-work and place it back on the agenda for the next telechat."<br><br>
<input type="radio" name="wg_action_status" value="2"> External Review NOT APPROVED;
<blockquote>
<blockquote style="border-left: 0">
<input type="radio" name="wg_action_status_sub" value="1"> The Secretariat will wait for instructions from <select name="note_draft_by"></select><br>
<input type="radio" name="wg_action_status_sub" value="2"> The IESG decides the document needs more time in INTERNAL REVIEW. The Secretariat will put it back on the agenda for the next teleconference in the same category.<br>
<input type="radio" name="wg_action_status_sub" value="3"> The IESG has made changes since the charter was seen in INTERNAL REVIEW, and decides to send it back to INTERNAL REVIEW the charter again.

View file

@ -1183,3 +1183,8 @@ td.position-empty {
}
}
}
blockquote {
padding-left: 1rem;
border-left: solid 1px var(--bs-body-color);
}