Early migration, mostly comments, committed to facilitate conversation.
- Legacy-Id: 18515
This commit is contained in:
Robert Sparks
parent
c95be797e7
commit
a2a0fdfae8
340
ietf/review/migrations/0025_repair_assignments.py
Normal file
340
ietf/review/migrations/0025_repair_assignments.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
|
|||
# Copyright The IETF Trust 2020 All Rights Reserved
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db import migrations
|
||||
|
||||
def forward(apps, schema_editor):
|
||||
ReviewAssignment = apps.get_model('review','ReviewAssignment')
|
||||
Document = apps.get_model('doc','Document')
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: Add some DocEvents recording that changes were made, and why, to the history of each affected reviewed document.
|
||||
|
||||
# review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart-lc-black is a double-submit
|
||||
# In [120]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart
|
||||
# ...: ').order_by('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart-lc-black-2020-06-30 2020-06-30 11:06:30
|
||||
# review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart-lc-black-2020-06-30-2 2020-06-30 11:06:30
|
||||
# (I've put some more detail below on this as my understanding of double-submit improved)
|
||||
# The recommendation is to point the reviewassignment at the first submission, and delete the -2.
|
||||
a = ReviewAssignment.objects.get(review_request__doc__name='draft-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation', review_request__team__acronym='tsvart')
|
||||
a.review = Document.objects.get(name='review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart-lc-black-2020-06-30')
|
||||
a.save()
|
||||
|
||||
# Document.objects.filter(name='review-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-04-tsvart-lc-black-2020-06-30-2').delete()
|
||||
# (11,
|
||||
# {'community.CommunityList_added_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'community.SearchRule_name_contains_index': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocument': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentAuthor': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_states': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentURL': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocExtResource': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocHistory': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistoryAuthor': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_states': 2,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocAlias_docs': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocReminder': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestone_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestoneHistory_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'liaisons.LiaisonStatementAttachment': 0,
|
||||
# 'meeting.SessionPresentation': 0,
|
||||
# 'message.Message_related_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'review.ReviewWish': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory': 2,
|
||||
# 'doc.NewRevisionDocEvent': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocEvent': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document': 1})
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: Remove the -2 from disk?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# This one is just simply disconnected. No duplicates or anything to remove.
|
||||
a = ReviewAssignment.objects.get(review_request__doc__name='draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment',review_request__team__acronym='opsdir')
|
||||
a.review = Document.objects.get(name='review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-09-opsdir-lc-banks-2020-01-31')
|
||||
a.save()
|
||||
|
||||
# This review took place when we were spinning up the review tool. I suspect there were bugs at the time that we no longer have insight into.
|
||||
# These two do not exist on disk
|
||||
# review-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04-secdir-lc-kaduk-2016-11-30
|
||||
# review-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04-secdir-lc-kaduk-2016-11-30-2
|
||||
# These are identical except for 0d0a vs 0a and newline at end of file
|
||||
# review-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04-secdir-lc-kaduk-2016-11-30-3
|
||||
# review-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04-secdir-lc-kaduk-2016-12-01
|
||||
# -12-01 is already reachable from the assignment. I suggest:
|
||||
# Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04-secdir-lc-kaduk-2016-11-30').delete()
|
||||
# (21,
|
||||
# {'community.CommunityList_added_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'community.SearchRule_name_contains_index': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocument': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentAuthor': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_states': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentURL': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocExtResource': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocHistory': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistoryAuthor': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_states': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocAlias_docs': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocReminder': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestone_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestoneHistory_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'liaisons.LiaisonStatementAttachment': 0,
|
||||
# 'meeting.SessionPresentation': 0,
|
||||
# 'message.Message_related_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'review.ReviewWish': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.NewRevisionDocEvent': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocEvent': 3,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document': 3})
|
||||
|
||||
a = ReviewAssignment.objects.get(review_request__doc__name='draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane',review_request__team__acronym='rtgdir',reviewer__person__name__icontains='singh')
|
||||
a.review = Document.objects.get(name='review-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-13-rtgdir-lc-singh-2020-01-29')
|
||||
a.state_id = 'completed'
|
||||
a.reviewed_rev='13'
|
||||
a.save()
|
||||
|
||||
# In [121]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-ietf-capport-architecture-08-genart-
|
||||
# ...: lc-halpern').order_by('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-ietf-capport-architecture-08-genart-lc-halpern-2020-05-16 2020-05-16 15:34:35
|
||||
# review-ietf-capport-architecture-08-genart-lc-halpern-2020-05-16-2 2020-05-16 15:35:55
|
||||
# Not the same as the other double-submits, but likely a failure on the first submit midway through processing that led to the second.
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-capport-architecture-08-genart-lc-halpern*
|
||||
# review-ietf-capport-architecture-08-genart-lc-halpern-2020-05-16-2.txt
|
||||
# Only -2 exists on disk
|
||||
# -2 is what is currently pointed to by the review assignment.
|
||||
# We could delete -05-16, and leave -05-16-2 as an anomoly. (-05-16 would 404)
|
||||
# Or we could replace -05-16 with the content of -2 and remove -2.
|
||||
# If we did the latter, any external references to -05-16-2 would break, but I'm reticent to start down the path of putting something sensical there.
|
||||
# Right now, any review document not pointed to by a reviewassignment is a database error, and the view code assumes it won't. We can make it more robust against crashing, but I don't think we should try to adapt the models to model the corruption.
|
||||
|
||||
# Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07
|
||||
# Got sent to the opsdir list (which is closed) twice - no resulting thread from either
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar*
|
||||
# review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-08-26-2.txt
|
||||
# review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-08-26.txt
|
||||
# In [122]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-du
|
||||
# ...: nbar').order_by('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-08-26 2019-08-26 14:13:29
|
||||
# review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-08-26-2 2019-08-26 14:13:29
|
||||
# This is a double-submit.
|
||||
# Right now, the ReviewAssignment points to 08-26. Suggest we:
|
||||
# Document.objects.filter(name='review-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-08-26-2').delete()
|
||||
# (12,
|
||||
# {'community.CommunityList_added_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'community.SearchRule_name_contains_index': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocument': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentAuthor': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_states': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocumentURL': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocExtResource': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.RelatedDocHistory': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistoryAuthor': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_states': 2,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_tags': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory_formal_languages': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocAlias_docs': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocReminder': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestone_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'group.GroupMilestoneHistory_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'liaisons.LiaisonStatementAttachment': 0,
|
||||
# 'meeting.SessionPresentation': 0,
|
||||
# 'message.Message_related_docs': 0,
|
||||
# 'review.ReviewWish': 0,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocHistory': 2,
|
||||
# 'doc.NewRevisionDocEvent': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.DocEvent': 1,
|
||||
# 'doc.Document': 1})
|
||||
|
||||
# In [73]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-detnet-m
|
||||
# ...: pls-over-udp-ip'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# <snip/>
|
||||
# review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2020-09-01 2020-09-01 13:47:55
|
||||
# review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2020-09-01-2 2020-09-01 13:47:55
|
||||
# review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2020-09-03 2020-09-03 02:49:33
|
||||
# review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2020-09-03-2 2020-09-03 02:49:33
|
||||
# <snip/>
|
||||
# Both of those are places where the submit button got hit twice in rapid successsion.
|
||||
# Messages went to the list twice. No threads were started
|
||||
# The review assignments currently point to the -2 versions. I think we change them to point to the not -2 versions and delete the -2 version documents.
|
||||
|
||||
# This draft had a contentious last call (not because of this review)
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls -l review-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03-genart*
|
||||
# -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun www 1087 Dec 4 2019 review-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2019-12-04-2.txt
|
||||
# -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun www 1087 Dec 4 2019 review-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2019-12-04-3.txt
|
||||
# -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun www 1087 Dec 4 2019 review-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2019-12-04.txt
|
||||
# These files are identical.
|
||||
# In [75]: Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bi
|
||||
# ...: s-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2019-12-04').values_list('time',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[75]: <QuerySet [datetime.datetime(2019, 12, 4, 13, 40, 30), datetime.datetime(2019, 12, 4, 13, 40, 30), datetime.datetime(2019, 12, 4, 13, 40, 32)]>
|
||||
# So again, the submit button got hit several times in rapid succession
|
||||
# Interestingly, this was a case where the review was sent to the list first and then Meral told the datatracker about it, so it's only on the list(s) once.
|
||||
# I think we change the assingment to point to 12-04 and delete -2 and -3.
|
||||
|
||||
# In [76]: Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06
|
||||
# ...: -secdir-lc-rose')
|
||||
# Out[76]: <QuerySet [<Document: review-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06-secdir-lc-rose-2020-01-27>, <Document: review-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06-secdir-lc-rose-2020-02-06>]>
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06-secdir-lc-rose*
|
||||
# review-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06-secdir-lc-rose-2020-02-06.txt
|
||||
# review assignment points to 02-06.
|
||||
# Suggest we delete -01-27
|
||||
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11-tsvart*
|
||||
# review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11-tsvart-lc-scharf-2020-01-28.txt
|
||||
# review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11-tsvart-lc-scharf-2020-03-27.txt
|
||||
# The second was derived from the list post, so it has "Reviewer: Michael Scharf Review result: Ready with Nits" added and is reflowed, but is otherwise identical.
|
||||
# In [80]: Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage
|
||||
# ...: -data-channel-11-tsvart-lc-scharf')
|
||||
# Out[80]: <QuerySet [<Document: review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11-tsvart-lc-scharf-2020-01-28>, <Document: review-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11-tsvart-lc-scharf-2020-03-27>]>
|
||||
# the 03-27 version was a resubmission by a secretary (Wes). The assignment currently points to 03-07, and it points to the 01-29 (! date there is in UTC) list entry.
|
||||
# 01-29 is in the window of confusion.
|
||||
# Suggest we just delete the -01-28 document object.
|
||||
|
||||
# In [81]: Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-mpls-spl-terminol
|
||||
# ...: ogy-03-opsdir-lc-jaeggli').values_list('time',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[81]: <QuerySet [datetime.datetime(2020, 8, 15, 16, 38, 37), datetime.datetime(2020, 8, 15, 16, 38, 37)]>
|
||||
# Another double-submit.
|
||||
# The review assignment already points to -08-15. Suggest we delete -08-15-2
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# In [82]: Document.objects.filter(name__startswith='review-ietf-netconf-subscribe
|
||||
# ...: d-notifications-23-rtgdir').values_list('time',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[82]: <QuerySet [datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 16, 3, 45, 4), datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 16, 3, 45, 6)]>
|
||||
# Another double-submit. This time the second won and the review assignments points to -2. I suggest we change it to point to the base and delete -2.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# In [84]: Document.objects.filter(name__contains='ietf-netconf-yang-push-22-genar
|
||||
# ...: t-lc-bryant').values_list('time',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[84]: <QuerySet [datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 10, 13, 40, 41), datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 10, 13, 40, 41)]>
|
||||
# In [85]: ReviewAssignment.objects.get(review__name__contains='ietf-netconf-yang-
|
||||
# ...: push-22-genart-lc-bryant').review
|
||||
# Out[85]: <Document: review-ietf-netconf-yang-push-22-genart-lc-bryant-2019-04-10-2>
|
||||
# Same as above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# In [92]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06').order_by
|
||||
# ...: ('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.external_url)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-genart-lc-nandakumar-2020-01-27 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/b'rGU9fbpAGtmz55Rcdfnl9ZsqMIo'
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-genart-lc-nandakumar-2020-01-30 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/rGU9fbpAGtmz55Rcdfnl9ZsqMIo
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-opsdir-lc-comstedt-2020-01-27 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/b'BjEE4Y0ZDRALgueoS_lbL5U06js'
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-opsdir-lc-comstedt-2020-02-10 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/BjEE4Y0ZDRALgueoS_lbL5U06js
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-secdir-lc-sheffer-2020-01-26 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hY6OTDbplzp9uONAvEjkcfa-N4A
|
||||
# This straddled the period of confusion.
|
||||
# For genart, Jean completed the review for the reviewer twice
|
||||
# for opsdir the reviewer submitted on different dates.
|
||||
# In both cases, the review only went to the list once, (the links above that are b'<>' are broken anyhow).
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-genart-lc-nandakumar*
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-genart-lc-nandakumar-2020-01-30.txt
|
||||
# rjsparks@ietfa:/a/www/ietf-ftp/review> ls review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-opsdir-lc-comstedt*
|
||||
# review-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06-opsdir-lc-comstedt-2020-02-10.txt
|
||||
# The review assignment objects point to the ones that are backed by disk files. I suggest we delete the others.
|
||||
|
||||
# In [101]: ReviewAssignment.objects.filter(review__name__contains='review-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-09-tsv
|
||||
# ...: art').values_list('review__name',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[101]: <QuerySet ['review-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-09-tsvart-lc-touch-2020-07-03-2']>
|
||||
# In [102]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-09-tsvart').o
|
||||
# ...: rder_by('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-09-tsvart-lc-touch-2020-07-03 2020-07-03 19:20:49
|
||||
# review-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-09-tsvart-lc-touch-2020-07-03-2 2020-07-03 19:20:49
|
||||
# Same as double-submits above.
|
||||
|
||||
# draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang history will be a bit more complicated to straighten out.
|
||||
# It is currently in AUTH48...
|
||||
# There is a combination of secretaries trying to route around the confusion and a reviewer accidentally updating the wrong review.
|
||||
# Everything went to lists.
|
||||
# In [110]: for rq in ReviewRequest.objects.filter(doc__name__contains='ietf-pim-msdp-yang'):
|
||||
# ...: print(rq)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# Early review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by YANG Doctors Assigned
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by YANG Doctors Assigned
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Overtaken by Events
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by Security Area Directorate Overtaken by Events
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by Ops Directorate Assigned
|
||||
# Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by Transport Area Review Team Team Will not Review Document
|
||||
# Telechat review on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang by Security Area Directorate Team Will not Review Version
|
||||
# In [107]: for a in ReviewAssignment.objects.filter(review__name__contains='review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang')
|
||||
# ...: .order_by('review__name'):
|
||||
# ...: print (a)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# Assignment for Reshad Rahman (Completed) : yangdoctors Early of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Yingzhen Qu (Completed) : rtgdir Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Reshad Rahman (Completed) : yangdoctors Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# In [105]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang').order_by('name'
|
||||
# ...: ):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# But
|
||||
# In [113]: for a in ReviewAssignment.objects.filter(review_request__doc__name='draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# ...: '):
|
||||
# ...: print(a)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# Assignment for Reshad Rahman (Completed) : yangdoctors Early of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Reshad Rahman (Completed) : yangdoctors Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Yingzhen Qu (Completed) : rtgdir Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Meral Shirazipour (No Response) : genart Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Vincent Roca (No Response) : secdir Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# Assignment for Shwetha Bhandari (Accepted) : opsdir Last Call of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
|
||||
# review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-01-yangdoctors-early-rahman-2018-01-12 2020-02-12 15:00:06
|
||||
# review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-08-rtgdir-lc-qu-2020-01-20 2020-01-20 15:00:00
|
||||
# review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-12-secdir-lc-roca-2020-01-29 2020-01-29 00:18:10
|
||||
# review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-12-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2020-01-28 2020-01-28 19:05:44
|
||||
# review-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-16-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2020-03-20 2020-03-20 06:16:25
|
||||
# So, the secdir assignment that exists needs to have the review added and its state changed.
|
||||
# The yangdoctor's assingment just needs to point to the completed review?
|
||||
# The requests need state tweaks
|
||||
# No suggestions to delete anything here.
|
||||
|
||||
# review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2020-08-20 2020-08-20 02:43:08
|
||||
# review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2020-08-20-2 2020-08-20 02:43:08
|
||||
# Assignment currently points to -2. Another double-submit. Resolve as above.
|
||||
|
||||
# In [116]: ReviewAssignment.objects.filter(review__name__contains='review-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07-
|
||||
# ...: opsdir').values_list('review__name',flat=True)
|
||||
# Out[116]: <QuerySet ['review-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02-2']>
|
||||
|
||||
# In [117]: for d in Document.objects.filter(name__contains='review-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07-opsdir'
|
||||
# ...: ).order_by('name'):
|
||||
# ...: print(d.name, d.time)
|
||||
# ...:
|
||||
# review-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02 2019-12-02 14:59:57
|
||||
# review-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02-2 2019-12-02 14:59:57
|
||||
# Another double-submit. Same treatment as above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: write a migration that repairs any remaining mailarchive urls that have b'<>' segments. There are currently 4, but the above suggestions would remove 2.
|
||||
|
||||
def reverse(apps, schema_editor):
|
||||
# There is no point in trying to return to the broken objects
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies = [
|
||||
('review', '0024_auto_20200520_0017'),
|
||||
('doc','0036_orgs_vs_repos'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
operations = [
|
||||
migrations.RunPython(forward, reverse),
|
||||
]
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue