From 9f74aca3423421c643ae074de4bb47128f74aef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Henrik Levkowetz Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:09:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Tweaked the wording on the account creation whitelisting page to emphasise the wording to be asked then emailing a querent. - Legacy-Id: 12916 --- ietf/templates/ietfauth/whitelist_form.html | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ietf/templates/ietfauth/whitelist_form.html b/ietf/templates/ietfauth/whitelist_form.html index 44113d005..3ea78c8ef 100644 --- a/ietf/templates/ietfauth/whitelist_form.html +++ b/ietf/templates/ietfauth/whitelist_form.html @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ If google finds no trace of the person being an ietf participant, he or she could still be somebody who is just getting involved in IETF work. A datatracker account - is probably not necessary, but in case this is a legitimate request, please email - the person and ask: + is probably not necessary, (no account is necessary to 'join' a WG -- the right thing + in that case is to join the right mailing list, and the person could be told so) -- + but in case this is a legitimate request, please email the person and ask:

@@ -73,6 +74,13 @@

+ Please note the exact wording. Do not ask about "working groups" -- + that will make it easier for people to google for IETF working groups. Ask the + question as given above, with lowercase "wgs". + +

+

+ If the answer to this question shows clue, then add the address to the whitelist using this form, and ask the person to please try the account creation form again.