From 57e553ed0400adbb716ea368850f54ce57aac5a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ole Laursen Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:52:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix draft-foo dummy - Legacy-Id: 3959 --- ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt b/ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt index 11399b920..4fcbde9b6 100644 --- a/ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt +++ b/ietf/templates/idrfc/approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt @@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ To: {{to}} Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for {{ doc.file_tag }} {% filter wordwrap:73 %} -The IESG has completed a review of consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. +The IESG has completed a review of <{{ doc.name }}> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. {% if disapproved %} The IESG recommends that '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} NOT be published as {{ full_status }}. {% else %} The IESG has no problem with the publication of '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} as {{ full_status }}. -The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker ({{ doc_url }}) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the comment log.{% endif %} +The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker ({{ doc_url }}) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log.{% endif %} A URL of this {{ doc_type }} is: {{ doc_url }}