Updated diff (should have committed with _idtracker_12689_)

- Legacy-Id: 512

test/diff/_idtracker_draft-ietf-isis-link-attr_

@@ -1,32 +1,29 @@
 --- https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=12689&rfc_flag=0 
 +++ /idtracker/draft-ietf-isis-link-attr/ 
-@@ -69,2 +69,4 @@
+@@ -40,2 +40,3 @@
 -This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits and more
 -...
 +This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
 +should be fixed before publication.
-+
 +This is a short ...
-@@ -84,1 +86,1 @@
--Traffic Engineering (TE)", > RFC 3784, June 2004. and more ...
-+Traffic Engineering (TE)", > RFC 3784, June ...
-@@ -91,4 +93,1 @@
+@@ -51,1 +52,1 @@
+-Traffic Engineering (TE)", > RFC3784, June 2004. and more ...
++Traffic Engineering (TE)", > RFC3784, June ...
+@@ -56,4 +57,1 @@
 -to be clear. What does an implementation do if a link is part of some
 -local protection? No reference is given to the process of computing a
 -protection path so it is not well defined what an excluded link should
 -not be included in.
 +to be clear. What does an implementation do if a link ...
-@@ -103,1 +102,3 @@
+@@ -66,1 +64,2 @@
 -length of 2 octets. and more ...
 +length of 2 octets.
-+
 +I think that ...
-@@ -109,1 +110,3 @@
+@@ -71,1 +70,2 @@
 -length of 2 octets. and more ...
 +length of 2 octets.
-+
 +I think that ...
-@@ -128,5 +131,2 @@
+@@ -83,5 +83,2 @@
 -2007-03-14 03
 -[fenner] I thought I had put this on the 3/8 telechat, but I screwed
 -up. I'll put it on the telechat after the IETF. I won't be AD any
@@ -34,25 +31,22 @@
 -The downrefs have been mentioned in the Last Call.
 +2007-03-14 03 [fenner] I thought I had put this on the 3/8 telechat,
 +but I screwed up. I'll put it on the telechat after the IETF ...
-@@ -140,1 +140,3 @@
+@@ -93,1 +90,2 @@
 -actions that need to be completed. and more ...
 +actions that need to be completed.
-+
 +First, in the IS-IS ...
-@@ -145,1 +147,3 @@
+@@ -97,1 +95,2 @@
 -actions that need to be completed. and more ...
 +actions that need to be completed.
-+
 +First, in the IS-IS ...
-@@ -168,1 +172,1 @@
+@@ -112,1 +111,1 @@
 -needed but it might be a bit long.
 +needed but it might be a ...
-@@ -181,1 +185,3 @@
+@@ -121,1 +120,2 @@
 -and more ...
 +Hi,
-+
 +I'm following up on Alex's AD Review ...
-@@ -198,1 +204,3 @@
+@@ -133,1 +133,3 @@
 -> Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute sub-TLV > and more ...
 +> Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute sub-TLV > > draft-ietf-isis-
 +link-attr-01.txt > > Abstract > > This document defines a sub-TLV