Merged in [10684] from lars@netapp.com:

Add warning about the accuracy of bibliographic information for Legacy RFCs.
 - Legacy-Id: 10688
Note: SVN reference [10684] has been migrated to Git commit 2ca2b92c24

bin/mergeready

@@ -125,14 +125,18 @@ def pipe(cmd, inp=None):
     return out
 
 def split_loginfo(line):
-    parts = line.split()
-    rev = parts[0][1:]
-    who = parts[2]
-    date = parts[4]
-    time = parts[5]
-    tz   = parts[6]
-    when = tzparse.tzparse(" ".join(parts[4:7]), "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z")
-    when = when.astimezone(pytz.utc)
+    try:
+        parts = line.split()
+        rev = parts[0][1:]
+        who = parts[2]
+        date = parts[4]
+        time = parts[5]
+        tz   = parts[6]
+        when = tzparse.tzparse(" ".join(parts[4:7]), "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z")
+        when = when.astimezone(pytz.utc)
+    except ValueError as e:
+        sys.stderr.write("Bad log line format: %s\n  %s\n" % (line, e))
+
     return rev, who, when
 
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------------

ietf/templates/doc/document_bibtex.bib

@@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
 {% load ietf_filters %}
 
 {% if doc.get_state_slug == "rfc" %}
+{% if doc.stream|slugify == "legacy" %}
+% Datatracker information for RFCs on the Legacy Stream is unfortunately often
+% incorrect. Please correct the bibtex below based on the information in the
+% actual RFC at https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc{{ doc.rfc_number }}.txt
+{% endif %}
 @misc{% templatetag openbrace %}rfc{{ doc.rfc_number }},
 	series =	{Request for Comments},
 	number=		{{ doc.rfc_number }},