From 2e6633c0162de6147d1810f7c8719e31c08aef7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:54:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Error message if the RFC Editor Note is in the writeup and in
 the new place.  - Legacy-Id: 10773

---
 .../draft/rfceditor_note_duplicate_error.html  | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 ietf/templates/doc/draft/rfceditor_note_duplicate_error.html

diff --git a/ietf/templates/doc/draft/rfceditor_note_duplicate_error.html b/ietf/templates/doc/draft/rfceditor_note_duplicate_error.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ddf69067d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ietf/templates/doc/draft/rfceditor_note_duplicate_error.html
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{% extends "base.html" %}
+{# Copyright The IETF Trust 2016, All Rights Reserved #}
+{% load origin %}
+
+{% block title %}Duplicate RFC Editor Note Error{% endblock %}
+
+{% block content %}
+  {% origin %}
+  <h1>There appear to be two RFC Editor Notes for this approved I-D</h1>
+
+  <p>Sorry, there appears to be an RFC Editor Note in the ballot writeup and
+    another one in the RFC Editor Note.  Please put all of the information for
+    the RFC Editor in the RFC Editor Note.</p>
+
+  <p>The document writeup can be edited
+  <a href="{% url "doc_view" name=doc.canonical_name %}writeup/"> <em>Here</em></a>.</p>
+
+{% endblock %}