Added a note to the draft/RFC stats pages about missing data.
- Legacy-Id: 15973
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9db218e31
commit
2d31d5d421
|
@ -66,6 +66,31 @@
|
|||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="alert alert-info ">
|
||||
|
||||
<b>Please Note:</b> The author information in the datatracker about RFCs
|
||||
with numbers lower than about 1300 and drafts from before 2001 is
|
||||
unreliable and in many cases absent. For this reason, statistics on these
|
||||
pages does not show correct author stats for corpus selections that involve such
|
||||
documents.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
<br/>
|
||||
<br/>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The reason for this situation is that Datatracker is primarily focused on
|
||||
managing workflow, not trying to provide history from the beginning of
|
||||
time. The Tools Team has talked about ways to crowd source this
|
||||
information, but the tooling to allow people with Datatracker accounts
|
||||
enter the author data is likely to be quite a bit of work, and is not
|
||||
imminent.
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="document-stats">
|
||||
{% include content_template %}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue