From 178748f282dbca117472d4838a9a4afcbd3d90d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:02:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] rfc.status.status (e.g., "Informational") conflicted with
 internetdraft.status.status (e.g., "Active", "Dead", ...). I assumed when I
 wrote {{ ..document.status.status }} that it would throw an exception and so
 be ignored for RFCs.  Mea culpa.  - Legacy-Id: 513

---
 ietf/templates/idtracker/idinternal_detail.html | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ietf/templates/idtracker/idinternal_detail.html b/ietf/templates/idtracker/idinternal_detail.html
index 6a53855db..1ad44b421 100644
--- a/ietf/templates/idtracker/idinternal_detail.html
+++ b/ietf/templates/idtracker/idinternal_detail.html
@@ -30,9 +30,11 @@
               <td>
                 <div class="largefont3">
 		  {{ object.document.displayname_with_link }}
-		  {% ifnotequal object.document.status.status "Active" %}
-		    ({{ object.document.status.status }})
-		  {% endifnotequal %}
+		  {% ifequal object.document.doctype "Draft" %}
+		    {% ifnotequal object.document.status.status "Active" %}
+		      ({{ object.document.status.status }})
+		    {% endifnotequal %}
+		  {% endifequal %}
 		  <font color="red">
 		  {% if object.via_rfc_editor %}
 		    (Independent submission via RFC Editor)